A recent internal study conducted by Meta, known as “Project MYST,” in collaboration with the University of Chicago, revealed that parental supervision and controls have minimal impact on children’s compulsive use of social media. Stressful life events were found to be a contributing factor to children’s inability to moderate their social media usage effectively.
The ongoing social media addiction trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court has shed light on alarming revelations. The plaintiff, referred to as “KGM” or “Kaley,” along with others, has accused social media companies of creating addictive and harmful products that have led young users to experience various mental health issues.
This trial is just one of many landmark cases this year that hold social media companies accountable for the impact on children. The outcomes of these lawsuits could potentially influence how these companies interact with their younger user base and may prompt regulatory actions.
While Meta, YouTube, and Snap are among the companies facing allegations in this trial, settlements have already been reached with ByteDance (TikTok) and Snap. The focus of the trial has been on Meta’s internal study, Project MYST, which highlighted the company’s awareness of the negative effects of social media use on teens.
According to the Project MYST findings, parental supervision and household factors showed little correlation with teens’ attentiveness to their social media usage. Even with parental controls or rules in place, teens were still prone to overusing social media. The study, based on a survey of 1,000 teens and their parents, revealed a lack of impact from parental interventions.
Furthermore, the study indicated that teens facing adverse life experiences were more likely to exhibit less control over their social media usage. This suggests that real-life trauma could contribute to an increased risk of addiction to social media platforms.
During the trial, Instagram head Adam Mosseri claimed unfamiliarity with Project MYST, despite indications that he approved the study. The plaintiff’s lawyer highlighted this as an example of social media companies needing to take responsibility for the negative consequences of their products.
As the trial progresses, the interpretation of studies like Project MYST and testimonies from both sides will play a crucial role. Meta’s lawyers attempted to shift the blame onto parents and external factors, emphasizing the complexities of individuals’ lives as contributing factors to negative emotional states.
The impact of these revelations and testimonies on the jury’s decision remains to be seen. Notably, Project MYST’s findings were never made public, and no warnings were issued to teens or parents based on the research.
Meta has yet to provide a response to these allegations.
