XLP and RSPS are both ETFs that focus on the U.S. consumer staples sector. XLP has a lower expense ratio, greater liquidity, and larger assets under management compared to RSPS. Despite this, RSPS is not as reliant on its top stocks to perform well and follows an equal-weighted approach for its portfolio.
When comparing XLP and RSPS, it is clear that XLP offers a more cost-effective option with an annual expense ratio of 0.08% compared to RSPS’s 0.40%. Both ETFs have similar dividend yields, with RSPS slightly edging out XLP at 2.8% versus 2.7%.
In terms of performance and risk, XLP has a lower max drawdown over five years compared to RSPS. However, the growth of $1,000 over five years is higher for XLP at $1,162 compared to RSPS at $980. Despite underperforming the S&P 500 in recent years, XLP may be a more appealing choice for investors seeking stability in consumer staples stocks due to its lower expenses and larger asset base.
