This week, the Department of Energy has terminated nearly $8 billion worth of awards, a move that has been portrayed by the Trump administration as prioritizing fossil fuels over renewables. However, documents acquired by TechCrunch reveal a more intricate reality behind this decision.
The agency has not disclosed the list of canceled awards, but TechCrunch has managed to obtain and analyze the 321 contracts that the DOE intends to revoke.
Not all the projects were solely focused on renewable energy. Two projects highlighted in the document, one awarding $300 million to Colorado State University and another granting $210 million to the Gas Technology Institute, were aimed at assisting oil and gas producers in mitigating methane emissions from their wells.
The Gas Technology Institute, primarily serving the natural gas industry, had twelve awards canceled, totaling $417 million as per the document.
The cancellation also impacted carbon capture and removal initiatives, with ten out of the twenty-one projects, totaling around $200 million, being axed. Although many of these projects were based in states that had voted for Harris, this criterion alone does not provide a full explanation of the situation.
Erin Burns, the executive director at Carbon180, pointed out three key factors to consider: the location of the projects, the involved partners, and the viability of the projects moving forward.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
States that supported Kamala Harris in the previous presidential election bore the brunt of the cancellations. California suffered the most significant loss, with contracts worth at least $2.2 billion being terminated. Similarly, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Oregon each faced cancellations worth approximately half a billion dollars, with New York State losing a minimum of $309 million.
On the other hand, states that voted for Trump mostly had contracts worth single-digit millions canceled.
One of the substantial awards revoked was a $467 million grant to Minnesota, designated under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021. The funding was intended to modernize electrical grid interconnections across seven Midwest states, potentially unlocking 28 gigawatts of new generating capacity, primarily from solar and wind sources.
Another notable cancellation, valued at $630 million, was aimed at enhancing California’s electrical grid by testing advanced conductors and dynamic line rating devices to boost transmission capacity. This project would have served as a model for grid modernization efforts nationwide.
Additionally, a grid modernization initiative focused on installing a transmission line to the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs in Oregon was halted. The canceled $250 million award would have facilitated the connection of approximately half a dozen renewable energy projects, along with laying fiber-optic lines to bring high-speed data to a rural area of the state.
Courtni Holness, a managing policy advisor at Carbon180, suggested that surviving recipients in blue states may align more closely with the administration’s priorities and industries of focus.
Some of the smaller awards that were rescinded might have been eliminated regardless. Burns explained that the U.S. energy innovation approach involves taking numerous low-cost chances due to uncertainties surrounding regional, technological, and economic advancements.
Furthermore, some recipients may be considering relocating to countries like Canada where government support and policies offer greater predictability. Burns emphasized that this trend is likely to impact private sector investments.
Holness raised concerns about the Department of Energy’s stability and its ability to provide consistent support to U.S. businesses, emphasizing the importance of predictability in their partnership.
